Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review

Evans, Catrin; Clancy, Georgia; Evans, Kerry; Booth, Andrew; Nazmeen, Benash; Sunney, Candice; Clowes, Mark; Jones, Nia Wyn; Timmons, Stephen; Spiby, Helen

Authors

Dr CATRIN EVANS CATRIN.EVANS@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Evidence Based Healthcare

KERRY EVANS Kerry.Evans1@nottingham.ac.uk
Associate Professor

Andrew Booth

Benash Nazmeen

Candice Sunney

Mark Clowes

Nia Wyn Jones

STEPHEN TIMMONS stephen.timmons@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Health Services Management



Abstract

Background: Digital transformation is a key component within the NHS Maternity Transformation Programme. The Covid-19 pandemic led to an acceleration of digital innovation, in particular, the use of digital clinical consultations (telephone/video consultations). The ways in which digital clinical consultations can be optimised and utilised alongside the traditional maternity care pathway remains unclear however, with particular concerns about the potential for digital care to exacerbate inequalities.

Objective: To explore how digital clinical consultations can be implemented in a clinically safe, appropriate and acceptable way within UK maternity services? For whom? In what settings? And for what purposes?

Design: A realist synthesis combining an evidence review of diverse sources (2010-present) from OECD countries with insights from key stakeholder groups (healthcare professionals, service users and community organisations).

Data sources: There were three main sources: (i) published primary and secondary research, (ii) grey literature (such as policy documents and maternity safety reports), and (iii) stakeholder insights.

Methods: A realist synthesis adopts a theory-driven approach which seeks to understand how a complex programme works, for whom and under what circumstances. The review had three iterative phases: (i) refining the review focus and developing initial programme theories, (ii) retrieval of evidence for data extraction and analysis (using on a realist logic to identify key contexts, mechanisms and outcomes), and (iii) testing and refining the programme theories.

Results: The final synthesis included 93 evidence sources (reviews, reports and 77 primary studies), with priority given to UK-focused studies. Study samples included a focus on healthcare professionals (n=17), women (n=45, of which 14 focused on vulnerable groups) or both (n=15). Clinical and safety related outcomes were reported in 12 studies. Fifteen programme theories were developed. A conceptual framework was produced that illustrates the inter-relationship between key contexts in maternity care through which different interactions activate mechanisms to produce outcomes of interest. The findings suggest that digital clinical consultations can be acceptable and appropriate if implementation includes personalisation and informed choice for women, as well as support and autonomy for staff. The relationship and connection between women and their healthcare professional are proposed as key mechanisms that support safety and engagement in care.

Limitations: Some of the evidence lacked detail regarding specific settings, interventions or sample characteristics. This limits the extent to which findings can be applied to micro-level contexts. Stakeholder groups contributed key insights to the review at all stages. In spite of efforts to achieve diversity within these groups, there may have been experiences or identities that were missed.

Conclusions: Four ‘CORE’ implementation principles were identified to guide future practice and research: C – Creating the Right Environment, Infrastructure and Support for Staff; O - Optimising Consultations to be Responsive, Flexible and Personalised to Different Needs and Preferences; R - Recognising the Importance of Access and Inclusion; and E – Enabling Quality and Safety through Relationship-Focused Connections.

Future work: Future research should embed equity considerations and should focus on understanding DC-CON within specific maternity systems (like triage/helplines), services (such as specialist outpatient clinics), or groups of women (e.g. with digital literacy or communication needs).

Study registration: The review is registered with Prospero: CRD42021288702.

Citation

Evans, C., Clancy, G., Evans, K., Booth, A., Nazmeen, B., Sunney, C., Clowes, M., Jones, N. W., Timmons, S., & Spiby, H. (in press). How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review. Health and Social Care Delivery Research,

Journal Article Type Book Review
Acceptance Date Jul 8, 2024
Deposit Date Jul 19, 2024
Journal Health and Social Care Delivery Research
Print ISSN 2755-0060
Electronic ISSN 2755-0079
Publisher NIHR Journals Library
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Keywords Realist Review; Evidence Synthesis; Remote Consultation; Telemedicine; Maternal Health Services
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/37316875