Jonathan C. Craig
Future of evidence ecosystem series: 3. From an evidence synthesis ecosystem to an evidence ecosystem
Craig, Jonathan C.; Ravaud, Philippe; Cr�quit, Perrine; Williams, Hywel C.; Meerpohl, Joerg; Boutron, Isabelle
Authors
Philippe Ravaud
Perrine Cr�quit
Professor HYWEL WILLIAMS HYWEL.WILLIAMS@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF DERMATO-EPIDEMIOLOGY
Joerg Meerpohl
Isabelle Boutron
Abstract
The “one-off” approach of systematic reviews is no longer sustainable; we need to move toward producing “living” evidence syntheses (i.e., comprehensive, based on rigorous methods, and up-to-date). This implies rethinking the evidence synthesis ecosystem, its infrastructure and management. The three distinct production systems — primary research, evidence synthesis and guidelines development — should work together to allow for continuous refreshing of synthesized evidence and guidelines. A new evidence ecosystem, not just focusing on synthesis, should allow for bridging the gaps between evidence synthesis communities, primary researchers, guidelines developers, health technology assessment agencies, and health policy authorities. This network of evidence synthesis stakeholders should select relevant clinical questions considered a priority topic. For each question, a multi-disciplinary community including researchers, health professionals, guidelines developers, policymakers, patients and methodologists needs to be established and commit to performing the initial evidence synthesis and keeping it up to date. Encouraging communities to work together continuously with bidirectional interactions requires greater incentives, rewards and the involvement of healthcare policy authorities to optimize resources. A better evidence ecosystem with collaborations and interactions between each partner of the network of evidence synthesis stakeholders should permit living evidence syntheses to justify their status in evidence-informed decision-making.
Citation
Craig, J. C., Ravaud, P., Créquit, P., Williams, H. C., Meerpohl, J., & Boutron, I. (2020). Future of evidence ecosystem series: 3. From an evidence synthesis ecosystem to an evidence ecosystem. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 123, 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.027
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 7, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 6, 2020 |
Publication Date | 2020-07 |
Deposit Date | Jan 14, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 7, 2021 |
Journal | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology |
Print ISSN | 0895-4356 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 123 |
Pages | 153-161 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.027 |
Keywords | Epidemiology |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3723674 |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435619305943 |
Files
R2 Paper 3 Clean Version
(225 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Topical anti-inflammatory treatments for eczema: network meta-analysis
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search