Getting back in the DeLorean: modernization vs. anti-modernization in contemporary British politics

Kerr, Peter; Foster, Emma; Oaten, Alex; Begum, Neema

Abstract

This article highlights a growing clash between mainstream modernizing and populist anti-modernizing forces in the UK. Whilst scholarship on UK party politics has, for the past three decades, focussed on processes of party modernization, little attention has been paid to the countervailing processes of resistance towards modernization. This contrasts with comparative studies, which show that throughout much of Europe modernization processes have worked to produce populist backlashes from anti-modernizing forces seeking to reassert various types of traditional values and practices. Drawing on the comparative literature on modernization, our argument here is that a similar populist backlash against modernization is occurring across the political spectrum in the UK and has been a factor in: the rise of nationalism associated with UKIP and the SNP; the 2016 BREXIT vote and the efforts of both Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and Conservative PM Theresa May to distance their parties from the legacies of their modernizing predecessors. Empirically, we show how this increasingly prevalent line of conflict is playing out in the UK, whilst theoretically we argue that a discourse theoretical approach can provide significant advantages over existing approaches for understanding the dynamic interplay between modernizing and anti-modernizing discourses.

Citation

Kerr, P., Foster, E., Oaten, A., & Begum, N. (2018). Getting back in the DeLorean: modernization vs. anti-modernization in contemporary British politics. Policy Studies, 39(3), 292-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2018.1478407

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: May 11, 2018
• Online Publication Date: Jun 27, 2018
• Publication Date: May 4, 2018
• Deposit Date: Jun 2, 2024
• Publicly Available Date: Jun 7, 2024
• Journal: Policy Studies
• Print ISSN: 0144-2872
• Electronic ISSN: 1470-1006
• Publisher: Routledge
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 39
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 292-309
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2018.1478407
• Public URL: https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/35642147
• Publisher URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01442872.2018.1478407