Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

RCT-based Social Return on Investment (SROI) of a Home Exercise Program for People With Early Dementia Comparing In-Person and Blended Delivery Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Doungsong, Kodchawan; Hartfiel, Ned; Gladman, John; Harwood, Rowan; Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor

RCT-based Social Return on Investment (SROI) of a Home Exercise Program for People With Early Dementia Comparing In-Person and Blended Delivery Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Thumbnail


Authors

Kodchawan Doungsong

Ned Hartfiel

John Gladman

Rhiannon Tudor Edwards



Abstract

Regular exercise and community engagement may slow the rate of function loss for people with dementia. However, the evidence is uncertain regarding the cost-effectiveness and social return on investment (SROI) of home exercise with community referral for people with dementia. This study aimed to compare the social value generated from the in-person PrAISED program delivered before March 2020 with a blended PrAISED program delivered after March 2020. SROI methodology compared in-person and blended delivery formats of a home exercise program. Stakeholders were identified, a logic model was developed, outcomes were evidenced and valued, costs were calculated, and SROI ratios were estimated. Five relevant and material outcomes were identified: 3 outcomes for patient participants (fear of falling, health-related quality of life, and social connection); 1 outcome for carer participants (carer strain), and 1 outcome for the National Health Service (NHS) (health service resource use). Data were collected at baseline and at 12-month follow-up. The in-person PrAISED program generated SROI ratios ranging from £0.58 to £2.33 for every £1 invested. In-person PrAISED patient participants gained social value from improved health-related quality of life, social connection, and less fear of falling. In-person PrAISED carer participants acquired social value from less carer strain. The NHS gained benefit from less health care service resource use. However, the blended PrAISED program generated lower SROI ratios ranging from a negative ratio to £0.08:£1. Compared with the blended program, the PrAISED in-person program generated higher SROI ratios for people with early dementia. An in-person PrAISED intervention with community referral is likely to provide better value for money than a blended one with limited community referral, despite the greater costs of the former. Trial registration: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN15320670.

Citation

Doungsong, K., Hartfiel, N., Gladman, J., Harwood, R., & Edwards, R. T. (2024). RCT-based Social Return on Investment (SROI) of a Home Exercise Program for People With Early Dementia Comparing In-Person and Blended Delivery Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 61, https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580241246468

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 22, 2024
Online Publication Date Apr 23, 2024
Publication Date 2024
Deposit Date Nov 19, 2024
Publicly Available Date Nov 20, 2024
Electronic ISSN 1945-7243
Publisher SAGE Publications
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 61
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580241246468
Keywords community referral, dementia, exercise, social return on investment (SROI), health economics
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/34318758
Publisher URL https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00469580241246468

Files

RCT-based Social Return on Investment (SROI) of a Home Exercise Program for People With Early Dementia Comparing In-Person and Blended Delivery Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic (897 Kb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Copyright Statement
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).





You might also like



Downloadable Citations