Why-UD? Assessing the requirement to trial an intrauterine device as a condition for elective sterilisation in female patients

Baron, Teresa

Abstract

Some National Health Service healthcare boards in the UK will approve a request for female sterilisation only if the patient first accepts a trial period of 1 year with an intrauterine device (IUD), a form of long-acting reversible contraception. In this article, I argue that this requirement is not justified by appeal to any of (or any combination of) promotion of informed consent, paternalistic concerns regarding patient regret in later life and health service budgetary considerations. Informed consent and patient autonomy may be promoted by a mandatory waiting period, but the concomitant imposition of an IUD trial during this period cannot be justified on these grounds. As long as elective vasectomy is offered by the healthcare system, elective female sterilisation should be accessible under reasonably similar - even if not identical - conditions.

Citation

Baron, T. (2024). Why-UD? Assessing the requirement to trial an intrauterine device as a condition for elective sterilisation in female patients. Journal of Medical Ethics, 50(10), 708-711. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-109264

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Nov 16, 2023
• Online Publication Date: Dec 13, 2023
• Publication Date: Sep 20, 2024
• Deposit Date: Feb 2, 2024
• Publicly Available Date: Feb 6, 2024
• Journal: Journal of Medical Ethics
• Print ISSN: 0306-6800
• Electronic ISSN: 1473-4257
• Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 50
• Issue: 10
• Pages: 708-711
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-109264
• Keywords: Contraception, Policy, Autonomy, Sterilization, Women
• Public URL: https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/29539948
• Publisher URL: https://jme.bmj.com/content/50/10/708