Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

‘Low’ faecal immunochemical test (FIT) colorectal cancer: a 4-year comparison of the Nottingham ‘4F’ protocol with FIT10 in symptomatic patients

Bailey, J A; Morton, A J; Jones, J; Oliver, S; Morling, J R; Patel, H; Humes, D J; Banergee, A

‘Low’ faecal immunochemical test (FIT) colorectal cancer: a 4-year comparison of the Nottingham ‘4F’ protocol with FIT10 in symptomatic patients Thumbnail


Authors

J A Bailey

J Jones

S Oliver

JOANNE MORLING JOANNE.MORLING@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Public Health and Epidemiology

H Patel

DAVID HUMES david.humes@nottingham.ac.uk
Clinical Associate Professor

A Banergee



Abstract

Aim:

To evaluate colorectal cancer outcomes after “low” (sub-threshold) Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) results in symptomatic patients tested in primary care.

Method:

Retrospective audit of 35,289 patients with FIT results, having consulted their general practitioner with lower gastrointestinal symptoms, and subsequent colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnoses. The Rapid Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis pathway was introduced in November 2017 to allow incorporation of FIT into clinical practice. The local “4F” protocol combined FIT results with blood tests and digital rectal examination (DRE): FIT, Full blood count (FBC), Ferritin and Finger.

Outcome:

Detection rates of CRC, missed CRC and time to diagnosis in local “4F” protocols for patients with a sub-threshold faecal Haemoglobin (fHb) result compared to thresholds of 10 and 20µgHb/g Faeces.

Results:

A single threshold of 10 µgHb/g Faeces identifies a population in whom the risk of CRC is 0.2% but would have missed 63 (10.5%) of 599 CRCs in this population. The Nottingham “4F” protocol would have missed fewer CRCs (42 of 599 (7%)) despite using a threshold of 20 µgHb/g Faeces for patients with normal blood tests. Subthreshold FIT results in patients subsequently diagnosed with a palpable rectal tumour yielded the longest delays.

Conclusion:

Combination of FIT with blood results and DRE (“4F”) reduced the risk of missed or delayed diagnosis. Further studies on the impact of such protocols on the diagnostic accuracy of FIT are expected. The value of adding blood tests to FIT may be restricted to specific parts of the fHb result spectrum.

Citation

Bailey, J. A., Morton, A. J., Jones, J., Oliver, S., Morling, J. R., Patel, H., …Banergee, A. (2024). ‘Low’ faecal immunochemical test (FIT) colorectal cancer: a 4-year comparison of the Nottingham ‘4F’ protocol with FIT10 in symptomatic patients. Colorectal Disease, 26(2), 309-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16848

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Nov 20, 2023
Online Publication Date Jan 3, 2024
Publication Date 2024-02
Deposit Date Nov 27, 2023
Publicly Available Date Nov 30, 2023
Journal Colorectal Disease
Print ISSN 1462-8910
Electronic ISSN 1463-1318
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 26
Issue 2
Pages 309-316
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16848
Keywords Colorectal Cancer, Faecal Immunochemical Testing, Blood tests, Digital rectal
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/27858416
Publisher URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14631318

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations