Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Comparison‐specific preferences: The attentional dilution effect for delay and risk

Read, Daniel; McDonald, Rebecca; Cubitt, Robin

Comparison‐specific preferences: The attentional dilution effect for delay and risk Thumbnail


Authors

Daniel Read

Rebecca McDonald

ROBIN CUBITT robin.cubitt@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Economics & Decision Research



Abstract

In cross‐modal decisions, the options differ on many attributes, and in uni‐modal decisions, they differ on few. We supply new theory and data to understand how discounting for both delay and risk differs between cross‐modal and uni‐modal decisions. We propose the attentional dilution effect in decision making in which (a) allocation of limited attention to an attribute determines that attribute's decision weight and (b) the attention an attribute receives is increasing in the difference between options on that attribute and decreasing in the number of other attributes that differ between options. We introduce the random order delayed compensation method and conduct two experiments focusing on delayed and risky receipt of consumer goods. Consistent with the attentional dilution effect, we find that in this domain, patience and risk tolerance are generally higher in cross‐modal than uni‐modal decisions. We suggest that, since many real‐world choices are cross‐modal, people may be more patient and risk‐tolerant in their everyday life than is suggested by standard lab experiments.

Citation

Read, D., McDonald, R., & Cubitt, R. (2023). Comparison‐specific preferences: The attentional dilution effect for delay and risk. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 36(5), Article e2348. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2348

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 24, 2023
Online Publication Date Aug 17, 2023
Publication Date 2023-12
Deposit Date Sep 21, 2023
Publicly Available Date Sep 21, 2023
Journal Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
Print ISSN 0894-3257
Electronic ISSN 1099-0771
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 36
Issue 5
Article Number e2348
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2348
Keywords attention, comparison‐specific preferences, cross‐modal, intertemporal choice, risky choice
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/24569438
Publisher URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdm.2348

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations