MATTHEW THOMASON MATT.THOMASON@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Assistant Professor
The Law Commission’s “Structured Discretion” Rape Shield: A Critique
THOMASON, MATTHEW
Authors
Abstract
Taking up a Chapter of its own in the Law Commission’s mammoth Evidence in Sexual Offences Prosecutions Consultation Paper are proposals to reform the admissibility rules for sexual behaviour (née sexual history) evidence (SBE). Though the Law Commission argues that its cornucopia of reform proposals be considered holistically, the reforms to the use of SBE deserve individual scrutiny given their particularly contentious status amongst practitioners, academics, and the public. The current rules, found in ss.41-43 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, have long been argued to be unsatisfactory and, after considering the vast literature on s.41 (including doctrinal, theoretical, empirical, and comparative work), the Law Commission agrees. This article critically considers these proposals to the admissibility of SBE, arguing that they are conceptually and doctrinally muddled, and fail to achieve the stated aims of better protecting both the defendant’s fair trial rights and the complainant’s privacy rights.
Citation
THOMASON, M. (2023). The Law Commission’s “Structured Discretion” Rape Shield: A Critique. Archbold Review, 2023(10), 4-10
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 14, 2023 |
Online Publication Date | Dec 11, 2023 |
Publication Date | Dec 11, 2023 |
Deposit Date | Aug 15, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Dec 12, 2024 |
Journal | Archbold Review |
Electronic ISSN | 2046-0201 |
Publisher | Thomson Reuters |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 2023 |
Issue | 10 |
Pages | 4-10 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/24405992 |
Publisher URL | https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I36FFE9E0962D11EEA47D9446F1D2DBC2/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default) |
Additional Information | This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Archbold Review following peer review. The definitive published version The Law Commission's "structured discretion" rape shield: a critique / Matt Thomason. Archbold Review, Arch. Rev. 2023, 10, 4-10 is available online on Westlaw UK. |
Files
This file is under embargo until Dec 12, 2024 due to copyright restrictions.
You might also like
Bargaining the Rules of Evidence
(2024)
Book Chapter
Excluding sexual behaviour evidence: back to first principles
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search