Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

On the Likelihood of Surrogates Conforming to the Substituted Judgment Standard When Making End-of-Life Decisions for Their Partner

Batteux, Eleonore; Ferguson, Eamonn; Tunney, Richard J.

On the Likelihood of Surrogates Conforming to the Substituted Judgment Standard When Making End-of-Life Decisions for Their Partner Thumbnail


Authors

Eleonore Batteux

EAMONN FERGUSON eamonn.ferguson@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Health Psychology

Richard J. Tunney



Abstract

A considerable proportion of end-of-life decisions are made by the patient’s next-of-kin, who can be asked to follow the substituted judgment standard and decide based on the patient’s wishes. The question of whether these surrogate decision makers are actually able to do so has become an important issue. In this study, we examined how the likelihood of surrogates conforming to the substituted judgment standard varies with individual differences in mortality acceptance and confidence in their decision making. We recruited 153 participants in romantic relationships between 18 and 80 years old from the general population. We asked them to make hypothetical end-of-life decisions for themselves and on behalf of their partner, as well as predict what their partner would do, and complete a series of questionnaires. Participants predicted that their partner would make similar decisions to their own but were more likely to accept a life-saving treatment that could result in reduced quality of life on their partner’s behalf than for themselves. Decisions made by older adults were more likely to conform to the substituted judgment standard, which is encouraging given that they are more likely to be confronted with these decisions in real life, although this was not due to differences in mortality acceptance. Older adults were also more likely to have had previous discussions with their partner and thereby know that person’s wishes and feel confident that they made the right decision, but these factors did not affect their likelihood of conforming to the substituted judgment standard. This shows that encouraging discussions about end of life among families would ease the decision process, but more work is needed to ensure that surrogates can adhere to the substituted judgment standard.

Citation

Batteux, E., Ferguson, E., & Tunney, R. J. (2019). On the Likelihood of Surrogates Conforming to the Substituted Judgment Standard When Making End-of-Life Decisions for Their Partner. Medical Decision Making, 39(6), 651-660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x19862800

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 14, 2019
Online Publication Date Jul 29, 2019
Publication Date Aug 1, 2019
Deposit Date Jun 26, 2019
Publicly Available Date Aug 7, 2019
Journal Medical Decision Making
Print ISSN 0272-989X
Electronic ISSN 1552-681X
Publisher SAGE Publications
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 39
Issue 6
Pages 651-660
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x19862800
Keywords Health Policy
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2231270
Publisher URL https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0272989X19862800
Contract Date Jun 26, 2019

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations