Eleonore Batteux
On the Likelihood of Surrogates Conforming to the Substituted Judgment Standard When Making End-of-Life Decisions for Their Partner
Batteux, Eleonore; Ferguson, Eamonn; Tunney, Richard J.
Authors
Abstract
A considerable proportion of end-of-life decisions are made by the patient’s next-of-kin, who can be asked to follow the substituted judgment standard and decide based on the patient’s wishes. The question of whether these surrogate decision makers are actually able to do so has become an important issue. In this study, we examined how the likelihood of surrogates conforming to the substituted judgment standard varies with individual differences in mortality acceptance and confidence in their decision making. We recruited 153 participants in romantic relationships between 18 and 80 years old from the general population. We asked them to make hypothetical end-of-life decisions for themselves and on behalf of their partner, as well as predict what their partner would do, and complete a series of questionnaires. Participants predicted that their partner would make similar decisions to their own but were more likely to accept a life-saving treatment that could result in reduced quality of life on their partner’s behalf than for themselves. Decisions made by older adults were more likely to conform to the substituted judgment standard, which is encouraging given that they are more likely to be confronted with these decisions in real life, although this was not due to differences in mortality acceptance. Older adults were also more likely to have had previous discussions with their partner and thereby know that person’s wishes and feel confident that they made the right decision, but these factors did not affect their likelihood of conforming to the substituted judgment standard. This shows that encouraging discussions about end of life among families would ease the decision process, but more work is needed to ensure that surrogates can adhere to the substituted judgment standard.
Citation
Batteux, E., Ferguson, E., & Tunney, R. J. (2019). On the Likelihood of Surrogates Conforming to the Substituted Judgment Standard When Making End-of-Life Decisions for Their Partner. Medical Decision Making, 39(6), 651-660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x19862800
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 14, 2019 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 29, 2019 |
Publication Date | Aug 1, 2019 |
Deposit Date | Jun 26, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 7, 2019 |
Journal | Medical Decision Making |
Print ISSN | 0272-989X |
Electronic ISSN | 1552-681X |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 39 |
Issue | 6 |
Pages | 651-660 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x19862800 |
Keywords | Health Policy |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2231270 |
Publisher URL | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0272989X19862800 |
Contract Date | Jun 26, 2019 |
Files
0272989x19862800
(549 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Guilty repair sustains cooperation, angry retaliation destroys it
(2017)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search