Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Less biased yet more defensive: The impact of control processes

Vitriol, Joseph A.; O’Shea, Brian A.; Calanchini, Jimmy

Less biased yet more defensive: The impact of control processes Thumbnail


Authors

Joseph A. Vitriol

Jimmy Calanchini



Contributors

Abstract

Educational and training programs designed to reduce racial bias often focus on increasing people’s awareness of psychological sources of their biases. However, when people learn about their biases, they often respond defensively, which can undermine the effectiveness of antibias interventions and the success of prejudice regulation. Using process (Quad) modeling, we provide one of the first investigations of the relationships between (a) controlled and automatic cognitive processes that underpin performance on the Implicit Association Test and (b) defensive reactions to unflattering implicit racial bias feedback. In two correlational samples (one preregistered; N = 8,000) and one experiment in which the provision of bias feedback was manipulated (N = 547), we find racially biased associations and some control over these associations among White people. Nonetheless, more defensiveness to bias feedback consistently predicted weaker ability to control biased associations. We also find correlational evidence that lower levels of biased associations predict more defensiveness, but did not replicate this observation in the experimental study. These results are critical for theories of implicit attitudes, models of prejudice regulation, and strategies for antibias interventions

Citation

Vitriol, J. A., O’Shea, B. A., & Calanchini, J. (2023). Less biased yet more defensive: The impact of control processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 30(1), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000468

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jan 1, 2023
Online Publication Date Mar 9, 2023
Publication Date Mar 9, 2023
Deposit Date May 10, 2023
Publicly Available Date May 12, 2023
Journal Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
Print ISSN 1076-898X
Electronic ISSN 1939-2192
Publisher American Psychological Association
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 30
Issue 1
Pages 108-119
DOI https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000468
Keywords implicit bias; diversity; prejudice and stereotyping; organizational behavioral; management science
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/20561287
Publisher URL https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fxap0000468
Additional Information This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. The final article is available, upon publication, at: https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fxap0000468