The natural pattern of birth timing and gestational age in the U.S. compared to England, and the Netherlands

Declercq, Eugene; Wolterink, Anneke; Rowe, Rachel; de Jonge, Ank; De Vries, Raymond; Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne; Verhoeven, Corine; Shah, Neel

Abstract

Objective To examine cross-national differences in gestational age over time in the U.S. and across three wealthy countries in 2020 as well as examine patterns of birth timing by hour of the day in home and spontaneous vaginal hospital births in the three countries. Methods We did a comparative cohort analysis with data on gestational age and the timing of birth from the United States, England and the Netherlands, comparing hospital and home births. For overall gestational age comparisons, we drew on national birth cohorts from the U.S. (1990, 2014 & 2020), the Netherlands (2014 & 2020) and England (2020). Birth timing data was drawn from national data from the U.S. (2014 & 2020), the Netherlands (2014) and from a large representative sample from England (2008–10). We compared timing of births by hour of the day in hospital and home births in all three countries. Results The U.S. overall mean gestational age distribution, based on last menstrual period, decreased by more than half a week between 1990 (39.1 weeks) and 2020 (38.5 weeks). The 2020 U.S. gestational age distribution (76% births prior to 40 weeks) was distinct from England (60%) and the Netherlands (56%). The gestational age distribution and timing of home births was comparable in the three countries. Home births peaked in early morning between 2:00 am and 5:00 am. In England and the Netherlands, hospital spontaneous vaginal births showed a generally similar timing pattern to home births. In the U.S., the pattern was reversed with a prolonged peak of spontaneous vaginal hospital births between 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. Conclusions The findings suggest organizational priorities can potentially disturb natural patterns of gestation and birth timing with a potential to improve U.S. perinatal outcomes with organizational models that more closely resemble those of England and the Netherlands.

Citation

Declercq, E., Wolterink, A., Rowe, R., de Jonge, A., De Vries, R., Nieuwenhuijze, M., …Shah, N. (2023). The natural pattern of birth timing and gestational age in the U.S. compared to England, and the Netherlands. PLoS ONE, 18(1), Article e0278856. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278856

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Nov 27, 2022
• Online Publication Date: Jan 18, 2023
• Publication Date: Jan 18, 2023
• Deposit Date: Mar 22, 2023
• Publicly Available Date: Mar 24, 2023
• Journal: PLoS ONE
• Electronic ISSN: 1932-6203
• Publisher: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 18
• Issue: 1
• Article Number: e0278856
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278856
• Keywords: Birth; England; Netherlands; Labor and delivery; Obstetrics and gynecology; Age distribution; Medical risk factors; Pregnancy
• Public URL: https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/16230792
• Publisher URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0278856