Lee Shepherd
Assessing the factors that influence the donation of a deceased family member's organs in an opt-out system for organ donation
Shepherd, Lee; O'Carroll, Ronan; Ferguson, Eamonn
Authors
Ronan O'Carroll
Professor EAMONN FERGUSON eamonn.ferguson@nottingham.ac.uk
PROFESSOR OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
Abstract
Rationale: Family, and sometimes longstanding friends, have considerable influence over organ donation, through agreeing or disagreeing to the donation of a deceased individual’s organs. To date, most research has been undertaken within opt-in systems.
Objective: This study advances on previous research by assessing next-of-kin approval under opt-out legislation. We tested whether next-of-kin approval varies when the deceased is a registered donor (opted-in), registered non-donor (opted-out) or has not registered a decision under an opt-out policy (deemed consent). We also tested if the deceased’s wishes influenced next-of-kin approval through relatives anticipating regret for not donating and feelings of uncertainty. Finally, we assessed whether next-of-kin’s own beliefs about organ donation influenced whether they followed the deceased’s wishes.
Method: Participants (N = 848) living in a country with opt-out legislation (Wales, UK) were asked to imagine a relative had died under an opt-out system and decided if their relatives’ organs should be donated. Participants were randomly allocated to imagine the deceased had either (i) opted-in, (ii) opted-out or (iii) not registered a decision (deemed consent). The outcome variable was next-of-kin approval, with uncertainty and anticipated regret as potential mediators and next-of-kin’s beliefs about organ donation as moderators.
Results: Next-of-kin approval was lower when the deceased had opted-out than under deemed consent. This was due to next-of-kin anticipating more regret for not donating under deemed consent than opt-out. Further analyses revealed the deceased’s wishes influence next-of-kin approval, via anticipated regret, when next-of-kin did not hold negative beliefs about organ donation.
Conclusions: The deceased’s wishes were less likely to be followed when next-of-kin had negative beliefs towards donation. Developing large-scale campaigns to improve these beliefs in the general public should make people more likely to follow the deceased’s wishes. As a result, these campaigns should improve the availability of donor organs.
Citation
Shepherd, L., O'Carroll, R., & Ferguson, E. (2023). Assessing the factors that influence the donation of a deceased family member's organs in an opt-out system for organ donation. Social Science and Medicine, 317, Article 115545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115545
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Nov 13, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 17, 2022 |
Publication Date | 2023-01 |
Deposit Date | Nov 15, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 24, 2022 |
Journal | Social Science and Medicine |
Print ISSN | 0277-9536 |
Electronic ISSN | 0277-9536 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 317 |
Article Number | 115545 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115545 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/13744626 |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953622008516?via%3Dihub |
Files
1-s2.0-S0277953622008516-main
(817 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
The power of arts‐based film interventions to encourage Black blood donors
(2024)
Journal Article
Blood Donor Incentives across 63 Countries: The BEST Collaborative Study
(2023)
Journal Article
Blood Donor Incentives across 63 Countries: The BEST Collaborative Study
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search