Hanan Khalil
The role of scoping reviews in reducing research waste
Khalil, Hanan; Peters, Micah D.J.; McInerney, Patricia A.; Godfrey, Christina M.; Alexander, Lyndsay; Evans, Catrin; Pieper, Dawid; Moraes, Erica B.; Tricco, Andrea C.; Munn, Zachary; Pollock, Danielle
Authors
Micah D.J. Peters
Patricia A. McInerney
Christina M. Godfrey
Lyndsay Alexander
Professor CATRIN EVANS CATRIN.EVANS@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF EVIDENCE BASED HEALTHCARE
Dawid Pieper
Erica B. Moraes
Andrea C. Tricco
Zachary Munn
Danielle Pollock
Abstract
Objectives: Scoping reviews and evidence map methodologies are increasingly being used by researchers. The objective of this article is to examine how scoping reviews can reduce research waste. Study Design and Setting: This article summarizes the key issues facing the research community regarding research waste and how scoping reviews can make an important contribution to the reduction of research waste in both primary and secondary research. Results: The problem of research waste is an enduring challenge for global health, leading to a waste of human and financial resources and producing research outputs that do not provide answers to the most pressing research questions. Research waste occurs within primary research but also in secondary research such as evidence syntheses. The focus of scoping reviews on characterizing the nature of existing evidence on a topic and including all types of evidence, potentially reduces research waste in five ways: (1) identifying key research gaps on a topic, (2) determining appropriate outcome measures, (3) mapping existing methodological approaches, (4) developing a consistent understanding of terms and concepts used in existing evidence, and (5) ensuring scoping reviews do not exacerbate the issue of research waste. Conclusion: To ensure that scoping reviews do not themselves end up contributing to research waste, it is important to register the scoping review and to ensure that international reporting standards and methodological guidance are followed.
Citation
Khalil, H., Peters, M. D., McInerney, P. A., Godfrey, C. M., Alexander, L., Evans, C., Pieper, D., Moraes, E. B., Tricco, A. C., Munn, Z., & Pollock, D. (2022). The role of scoping reviews in reducing research waste. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 152, 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.09.012
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 21, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 27, 2022 |
Publication Date | Dec 1, 2022 |
Deposit Date | Oct 10, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 28, 2023 |
Journal | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology |
Print ISSN | 0895-4356 |
Electronic ISSN | 1878-5921 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 152 |
Pages | 30-35 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.09.012 |
Keywords | reporting, research waste, methodology, Scoping reviews, quality |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/11755911 |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435622002335 |
Files
role of scoping reviews
(286 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
“How-to”: scoping review?
(2024)
Journal Article
Reconstructive surgery for women with female genital mutilation: A scoping review
(2024)
Journal Article
Automation tools to support undertaking scoping reviews
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search