Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Fulvestrant 500 mg Versus Anastrozole 1 mg for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer: Overall Survival Analysis From the Phase II FIRST Study

Robertson, John; Ellis, Matthew; Llombart-Cussac, Antonio; Feltl, David; Dewar, John; Jasi�wka, Marek; Hewson, Nicola; Rukazenkov, Yuri

Fulvestrant 500 mg Versus Anastrozole 1 mg for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer: Overall Survival Analysis From the Phase II FIRST Study Thumbnail


Authors

Matthew Ellis

Antonio Llombart-Cussac

David Feltl

John Dewar

Marek Jasi�wka

Nicola Hewson

Yuri Rukazenkov



Abstract

Purpose

To compare overall survival (OS) for fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole as first-line endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer.

Patients and Methods

The Fulvestrant First-Line Study Comparing Endocrine Treatments (FIRST) was a phase II, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial. Postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor–positive, locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer who had no previous therapy for advanced disease received either fulvestrant 500 mg (days 0, 14, 28, and every 28 days thereafter) or anastrozole 1 mg (daily). The primary end point (clinical benefit rate [72.5% and 67.0%]) and a follow-up analysis (median time to progression [23.4 months and 13.1 months]) have been reported previously for fulvestrant 500 mg and anastrozole, respectively. Subsequently, the protocol was amended to assess OS by unadjusted log-rank test after approximately 65% of patients had died. Treatment effect on OS across several subgroups was examined. Tolerability was evaluated by adverse event monitoring.

Results

In total, 205 patients were randomly assigned (fulvestrant 500 mg, n = 102; anastrozole, n = 103). At data cutoff, 61.8% (fulvestrant 500 mg, n = 63) and 71.8% (anastrozole, n = 74) had died. The hazard ratio (95% CI) for OS with fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole was 0.70 (0.50 to 0.98; P = .04; median OS, 54.1 months v 48.4 months). Treatment effects seemed generally consistent across the subgroups analyzed. No new safety issues were observed.

Conclusion

There are several limitations of this OS analysis, including that it was not planned in the original protocol but instead was added after time-to-progression results were analyzed, and that not all patients participated in additional OS follow-up. However, the present results suggest fulvestrant 500 mg extends OS versus anastrozole. This finding now awaits prospective confirmation in the larger phase III FALCON (Fulvestrant and Anastrozole Compared in Hormonal Therapy Naïve Advanced Breast Cancer) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01602380).

Citation

Robertson, J., Ellis, M., Llombart-Cussac, A., Feltl, D., Dewar, J., Jasiówka, M., …Rukazenkov, Y. (2015). Fulvestrant 500 mg Versus Anastrozole 1 mg for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer: Overall Survival Analysis From the Phase II FIRST Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33(32), 3781-3787. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.61.5831

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 23, 2015
Online Publication Date Sep 14, 2015
Publication Date Nov 10, 2015
Deposit Date Sep 8, 2017
Publicly Available Date Nov 16, 2020
Journal Journal of Clinical Oncology
Print ISSN 0732-183X
Electronic ISSN 1527-7755
Publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 33
Issue 32
Pages 3781-3787
DOI https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.61.5831
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1118300
Publisher URL https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2015.61.5831
PMID 26371134