Outcome Assessment by Central Adjudicators Versus Site Investigators in Stroke Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
(2019)
Journal Article
Godolphin, P. J., Bath, P. M., Algra, A., Berge, E., Brown, M. M., Chalmers, J., Duley, L., Eliasziw, M., Gregson, J., Greving, J. P., Hankey, G. J., Hosomi, N., Johnston, S. C., Patsko, E., Ranta, A., Sandset, P. M., Serena, J., Weimar, C., Montgomery, A. A., Knipp, S., …on behalf of the Adjudicating Outcomes in Stroke Trials Collaboration*. (2019). Outcome Assessment by Central Adjudicators Versus Site Investigators in Stroke Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Stroke, 50(8), 2187-2196. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.119.025019
© 2019 American Heart Association, Inc. Background and Purpose-In randomized stroke trials, central adjudication of a trial's primary outcome is regularly implemented. However, recent evidence questions the importance of central adjudication in rando... Read More about Outcome Assessment by Central Adjudicators Versus Site Investigators in Stroke Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.