Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

All Outputs (8)

Rethinking the orality/confrontation paradigm in a world of remote evidence (2023)
Journal Article
Jackson, J. (2023). Rethinking the orality/confrontation paradigm in a world of remote evidence. Criminal Law Review, 265-285

This article reviews the various legislative and court initiatives which have made incursions into the orality/confrontation paradigm in recent years and in particular the recent statutory provision which was given impetus by the COVID-19 pandemic en... Read More about Rethinking the orality/confrontation paradigm in a world of remote evidence.

View Of Statutes Of Limitation In The United Kingdom (2022)
Journal Article
JACKSON, J., & Johnstone, J. (2022). View Of Statutes Of Limitation In The United Kingdom. Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo, 49(4), 3887-3906

Unlike most other European jurisdictions, the UK has no general statute of limitations for criminal offences except for minor offences tried in the lower courts. This article first considers how defendants have been protected without the need for suc... Read More about View Of Statutes Of Limitation In The United Kingdom.

Exploring the autistic and police perspectives of the custody process through a participative walkthrough (2019)
Journal Article
Holloway, C. A., Munro, N., Jackson, J., Phillips, S., & Ropar, D. (2020). Exploring the autistic and police perspectives of the custody process through a participative walkthrough. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 97, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2019.103545

© 2019 The Authors Background: Research suggests that autistic individuals may be more likely to come into contact with police and have more negative experiences in police custody. However, limited information about the difficulties they experience d... Read More about Exploring the autistic and police perspectives of the custody process through a participative walkthrough.

Responses to Salduz: procedural tradition, change and the need for effective defence (2016)
Journal Article
Jackson, J. D. (2016). Responses to Salduz: procedural tradition, change and the need for effective defence. Modern Law Review, 79(6), 987-1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12227

This article examines the responses of national courts to the ECtHR's decision in Salduz v Turkey that suspects be provided with access to a lawyer before they are first interrogated by the police. It argues that harmonious application of human right... Read More about Responses to Salduz: procedural tradition, change and the need for effective defence.

Lay adjudication in Europe: the rise and fall of the traditional jury (2016)
Journal Article
Jackson, J. D., & Kovalev, N. P. (2016). Lay adjudication in Europe: the rise and fall of the traditional jury. 00 Journal not listed, 6(2), 368-395

Drawing on a second survey of lay adjudication in Europe conducted by the authors in 2011-2012, this article points to a general decline across Europe in the use of the ‘traditional’ jury and a trend towards diminishing its capacity to deliver indepe... Read More about Lay adjudication in Europe: the rise and fall of the traditional jury.

Witness Preparation in the ICC: An Opportunity for Principled Pragmatism (2015)
Journal Article
Jackson, J. D., & Brunger, Y. M. (2015). Witness Preparation in the ICC: An Opportunity for Principled Pragmatism. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 13(3), 601-624. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqv024

In January 2013, Trial Chamber V of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in the cases of William Ruto and Joshua Sang and of Francis Muthaura and Uhuru Kenyatta, collectively known as the ‘Kenya decisions’, made a marked departure from the firm pro... Read More about Witness Preparation in the ICC: An Opportunity for Principled Pragmatism.

Reconceptualising the right of silence as an effective fair trial standard (2009)
Journal Article
Jackson, J. (2009). Reconceptualising the right of silence as an effective fair trial standard. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 58(4), https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589309001407

As the European Court of Human Rights has come to qualify the privilege against self-incrimination and the right of silence in recent decisions, this article argues that the Court has failed to provide a convincing rationale for these rights. It is c... Read More about Reconceptualising the right of silence as an effective fair trial standard.

Modern trends in evidence scholarship: is all rosy in the garden? (2003)
Journal Article
Jackson, J. (2003). Modern trends in evidence scholarship: is all rosy in the garden?

This article reviews the state of evidence scholarship in the early 21st century and argues that it has been enriched by drawing upon a range of different disciplines including social psychology,cognitive science, forensic psychology, mathematics, li... Read More about Modern trends in evidence scholarship: is all rosy in the garden?.