Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Psychological interventions for adults with bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Oud, Matthijs; Mayo-Wilson, Evan; Braidwood, Ruth; Schulte, Peter; Jones, Steven H.; Morriss, Richard K.; Kupka, Ralph; Cuijpers, Pim; Kendall, Tim

Authors

Matthijs Oud

Evan Mayo-Wilson

Ruth Braidwood

Peter Schulte

Steven H. Jones

Richard K. Morriss

Ralph Kupka

Pim Cuijpers

Tim Kendall



Abstract

Background Psychological interventions may be beneficial for bipolar disorder.
Aims Efficacy evaluation of psychological interventions for adults with bipolar disorder.
Methods A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.. Outcomes were meta-analysed using RevMan and confidence assessed using the GRADE-method.
Results We included 55 trials with 6010 participants. Moderate quality evidence associated individual psychological interventions with reduced relapses at post-treatment and follow-up, and collaborative care with a reduction in hospitalisations. . Low quality evidence associated group interventions with fewer depression relapses at post-treatment and follow-up, and family psycho-education with reduced symptoms of depression and mania at post-treatment.
Conclusions There is evidence that psychological interventions are effective for people with bipolar disorder. Limits were the very low quality of much of the evidence and therefore inconclusive. Further research should identify the most (cost)-effective interventions for each phase of this disorder.

Citation

Oud, M., Mayo-Wilson, E., Braidwood, R., Schulte, P., Jones, S. H., Morriss, R. K., …Kendall, T. (2016). Psychological interventions for adults with bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 208(3), 213-222. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.114.157123

Journal Article Type Article
Online Publication Date Jan 2, 2018
Publication Date Mar 1, 2016
Deposit Date Mar 24, 2016
Publicly Available Date Mar 24, 2016
Journal British Journal of Psychiatry
Print ISSN 0007-1250
Electronic ISSN 1472-1465
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 208
Issue 3
Pages 213-222
DOI https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.114.157123
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/977949
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.114.157123
Additional Information This is an author-produced electronic version of an article accepted for publication in the British Journal of Psychiatry. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available online at http://bjp.rcpsych.org)

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations