Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Hearing impairment and cognitive energy: the Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL)

Pichora-Fuller, M. Kathleen; Kramer, Sophia; Eckert, Mark A.; Edwards, Brent; Hornsby, Benjamin W.Y.; Humes, Larry E.; Lemke, Ulrike; Lunner, Thomas; Matthen, Mohan; Mackersie, Carol L.; Naylor, Graham; Phillips, Natalie A.; Richter, Michael; Rudner, Mary; Sommers, Mitchell S.; Tremblay, Kelly L.; Wingfield, Arthur

Authors

M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller

Sophia Kramer

Mark A. Eckert

Brent Edwards

Benjamin W.Y. Hornsby

Larry E. Humes

Ulrike Lemke

Thomas Lunner

Mohan Matthen

Carol L. Mackersie

Profile Image

GRAHAM NAYLOR GRAHAM.NAYLOR@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Hearing Sciences

Natalie A. Phillips

Michael Richter

Mary Rudner

Mitchell S. Sommers

Kelly L. Tremblay

Arthur Wingfield



Abstract

The Fifth Eriksholm Workshop on “Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy” was convened to develop a consensus among interdisciplinary experts about what is known on the topic, gaps in knowledge, the use of terminology, priorities for future research, and implications for practice. The general term cognitive energy was chosen to facilitate the broadest
possible discussion of the topic. It goes back to Titchener (1908) who described the effects of attention on perception; he used the term psychic energy for the notion that limited mental resources can be flexibly allocated among perceptual and mental activities. The workshop focused on three main areas: (1) theories, models, concepts, definitions, and frameworks; (2) methods and measures; and (3) knowledge translation. We defined effort as the deliberate allocation of mental resources to overcome obstacles in goal pursuit when carrying out a task, with listening effort applying more specifically when tasks involve listening. We adapted Kahneman’s seminal (1973) Capacity Model of Attention to listening and proposed a heuristically useful Framework for Understanding
Effortful Listening (FUEL). Our FUEL incorporates the well-known relationship between cognitive demand and the supply of cognitive capacity that is the foundation of cognitive theories of attention. Our FUEL also incorporates a motivation dimension based on complementary theories of motivational intensity, adaptive gain control, and optimal performance, fatigue, and pleasure. Using a three-dimensional illustration, we highlight how listening effort depends not only on hearing difficulties and task demands but also on the listener’s motivation to expend mental effort in the challenging situations of everyday life.

Citation

Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Kramer, S., Eckert, M. A., Edwards, B., Hornsby, B. W., Humes, L. E., …Wingfield, A. (2016). Hearing impairment and cognitive energy: the Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL). Ear and Hearing, 37, Article 5S-27S. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 15, 2016
Publication Date Jul 1, 2016
Deposit Date Oct 31, 2016
Publicly Available Date Oct 31, 2016
Journal Ear and Hearing
Print ISSN 0196-0202
Electronic ISSN 1538-4667
Publisher Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 37
Article Number 5S-27S
DOI https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312
Keywords Attention, Autonomic nervous system, Cognitive capacity,
Cognitive energy, Effortful listening, Executive function, Fatigue, Listening effort, Hearing impairment, Motivation, Neuroeconomics,Stress, Working memory
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/976208
Publisher URL http://journals.lww.com/ear-hearing/Abstract/2016/07001/Hearing_Impairment_and_Cognitive_Energy___The.2.aspx

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations