Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Rigorous morality: norms, values, and the comparative politics of human rights

Landman, Todd

Rigorous morality: norms, values, and the comparative politics of human rights Thumbnail



This paper argues that there is a strong role for empirical analysis to be used to address fundamental normative questions. Using human rights as an example, the article shows that the evolution of the international regime of human rights provides a standard against which country level performance can be both judged and explained through the application of empirical approaches in comparative politics. It argues further that different kinds of human rights measures (events, standards, surveys, and official statistics) and comparative methods (large-N, small-N and single-country studies) offer systematic ways in which to map, explain, and understand the variation in human rights abuse around the world. In this way, the comparative politics of human rights is prime example of how the ‘is’ of the world can be used to address the ‘ought’ of international human rights theory, philosophy, and law. The example of human rights analysis in comparative politics shows a strong role for value- based and problem-based research that remains systematic in its approach while at the same producing outputs that are of public value.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jan 2, 2016
Publication Date Feb 1, 2016
Deposit Date Jun 14, 2016
Publicly Available Date Jun 14, 2016
Journal Human Rights Quarterly
Print ISSN 0275-0392
Electronic ISSN 1085-794X
Publisher Johns Hopkins University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 38
Issue 1
Public URL
Publisher URL


You might also like

Downloadable Citations