Lauren Jade Fothergill
Nationwide evaluation of the advanced clinical practitioner role in England: a cross-sectional survey
Fothergill, Lauren Jade; Al-Oraibi, Amani; Houdmont, Jonathan; Conway, Jaoy; Evans, Catrin; Timmons, Stephen; Pearce, Ruth; Blake, Holly
Authors
AMANI AL-ORAIBI Amani.Al-Oraibi1@nottingham.ac.uk
Research Fellow
Dr JONATHAN HOUDMONT JONATHAN.HOUDMONT@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Assistant Professor
Jaoy Conway
Dr CATRIN EVANS CATRIN.EVANS@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Evidence Based Healthcare
STEPHEN TIMMONS stephen.timmons@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Health Services Management
Ruth Pearce
HOLLY BLAKE holly.blake@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Behavioural Medicine
Abstract
Background and study objective In response to growing pressures on healthcare systems, the advanced clinical practice (ACP) role has been implemented widely in the UK and internationally. In England, ACP is a level of practice applicable across various healthcare professions, who exercise a level of autonomy across four domains, referred to as the four pillars of practice (education, leadership, research and clinical practice). A national framework for ACP was established in 2017 to ensure consistency across the ACP role, however current ACP governance, education and support is yet to be evaluated. This study aimed to analyse data from a national survey of the ACP role to inform the development and improvement of policies relating to ACP in the National Health Service (NHS) in England. Design A cross-sectional survey with free-text comments. Setting The survey was distributed across primary and secondary levels of care to three distinct groups in England, including individual ACPs, NHS provider organisations and Trusts and primary care settings. Participants A total of 4365 surveys were returned, from ACP staff (n=4013), NHS provider organisations and Trusts (n=166) and primary care organisations (n=186). Results Considerable variation was found in role titles, scope of practice, job descriptions and educational backgrounds of ACPs. Differing approaches to governance were noted, which led to inconsistent ACP frameworks in some organisations. A further challenge highlighted included committing time to work across the four pillars of advanced practice, particularly the research pillar. ACPs called for improvements in supervision and continuing professional development alongside further support in navigating career pathways. Conclusions A standardised approach may support ACP workforce development in England and enable ACPs to work across the four pillars of practice. Due to the wide uptake of ACP roles internationally, this study has relevance across professions for global healthcare workforce transformation
Citation
Fothergill, L. J., Al-Oraibi, A., Houdmont, J., Conway, J., Evans, C., Timmons, S., …Blake, H. (2022). Nationwide evaluation of the advanced clinical practitioner role in England: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open, 12(1), Article e055475. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055475
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Conference Name | Midlands Academy of Medical Sciences Research Festival |
Conference Location | Nottingham |
Acceptance Date | Dec 15, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 5, 2022 |
Publication Date | Jan 5, 2022 |
Deposit Date | Apr 1, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 1, 2022 |
Electronic ISSN | 2044-6055 |
Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
Volume | 12 |
Issue | 1 |
Article Number | e055475 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055475 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/7682978 |
Related Public URLs | https://www.midlandshealthalliance.org.uk/events-blog/2022/3/30/academy-of-medical-sciences-research-festival-2022 |
Files
Nationwide evaluation of the advanced clinical practitioner role in England: a cross-sectional survey
(51 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Self-Isolation on Students and Staff in Higher Education: A Qualitative Study
(2022)
Presentation / Conference