Catherine Preece
Were Fertile Crescent crop progenitors higher yielding than other wild species that were never domesticated?
Preece, Catherine; Livarda, Alexandra; Wallace, Michael; Martin, Gemma; Charles, Michael; Christin, Pascal-Antoine; Jones, Glynis; Rees, Mark; Osborne, Colin P.
Authors
Alexandra Livarda
Michael Wallace
Gemma Martin
Michael Charles
Pascal-Antoine Christin
Glynis Jones
Mark Rees
Colin P. Osborne
Abstract
During the origin of agriculture in the Fertile Crescent, the broad spectrum of wild plant species exploited by hunter-gatherers narrowed dramatically. The mechanisms responsible for this specialization and the associated domestication of plants are intensely debated. We investigated why some species were domesticated rather than others, and which traits they shared.
We tested whether the progenitors of cereal and pulse crops, grown individually, produced a higher yield and less chaff than other wild grasses and legumes, thereby maximizing the return per seed planted and minimizing processing time. We compared harvest traits of species originating from the Fertile Crescent, including those for which there is archaeological evidence of deliberate collection.
Unexpectedly, wild crop progenitors in both families had neither higher grain yield nor, in grasses, less chaff, although they did have larger seeds. Moreover, small-seeded grasses actually returned a higher yield relative to the mass of seeds sown. However, cereal progenitors had threefold fewer seeds per plant, representing a major difference in how seeds are packaged on plants.
These data suggest that there was no intrinsic yield advantage to adopting large-seeded progenitor species as crops. Explaining why Neolithic agriculture was founded on these species, therefore, remains an important unresolved challenge.
Citation
Preece, C., Livarda, A., Wallace, M., Martin, G., Charles, M., Christin, P.-A., …Osborne, C. P. (2015). Were Fertile Crescent crop progenitors higher yielding than other wild species that were never domesticated?. New Phytologist, 207(3), https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13353
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Mar 11, 2015 |
Deposit Date | Jan 6, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 6, 2016 |
Journal | New Phytologist |
Print ISSN | 0028-646X |
Electronic ISSN | 1469-8137 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 207 |
Issue | 3 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13353 |
Keywords | crop progenitors, domestication, Fertile Crescent, harvest traits, origins of agriculture, seed size, yield |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/747823 |
Publisher URL | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.13353/full |
Files
nph13353-sup-0001-FigS1-S5-TabS1-S4.pdf
(335 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Preece et al 2015 New Phytologist_Were fertile crescent crop progenitors.pdf
(473 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search