Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Cost analysis of the Communication and Low Mood (CALM) randomised trial of behavioural therapy for stroke patients with aphasia

Humphreys, Ioan; Thomas, Shirley A.; Phillips, Ceri; Lincoln, Nadina

Cost analysis of the Communication and Low Mood (CALM) randomised trial of behavioural therapy for stroke patients with aphasia Thumbnail


Authors

Ioan Humphreys

Shirley A. Thomas

Ceri Phillips

Nadina Lincoln



Abstract

Objective:
To evaluate the cost effectiveness of a behavioural therapy intervention shown to be clinically effective in comparison with usual care for stroke patients with aphasia.

Design:
Randomised controlled trial with comparison of costs and calculation of incremental cost effectiveness ratio.

Setting:
Community.

Participants:
Participants identified as having low mood on either the Visual Analog Mood Scale sad item (≥50) or Stroke Aphasic Depression Questionnaire Hospital version 21 (SADQH21) (≥6) were recruited.

Interventions:
Participants were randomly allocated to behavioural therapy or usual care using internet-based randomisation generated in advance of the study by a clinical trials unit.

Main measures:
Outcomes were assessed at six months after randomisation, blind to group allocation. The costs were assessed from a service use questionnaire. Effectiveness was defined as the change in SADQH21 scores and a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed comparing the behavioural group with the usual care control group. The cost analysis was undertaken from the perspective of the UK NHS and Social Services.

Results:
The greatest difference was in home help costs where there was a saving of £56.20 in the intervention group compared to an increase of £61.40 in the control group. At six months the SADQH21 score for the intervention group was 17.3 compared to the control group value of 20.4. This resulted in a mean increase of 0.7 in the control group, compared to a mean significant different decrease of 6 in the intervention group (P = 0.003). The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio indicated that the cost per point reduction on the SADQH21 was £263.

Conclusion:
Overall the behavioural therapy was found to improve mood and resulted in some encouraging savings in resource utilisation over the six months follow-up.

Citation

Humphreys, I., Thomas, S. A., Phillips, C., & Lincoln, N. (2015). Cost analysis of the Communication and Low Mood (CALM) randomised trial of behavioural therapy for stroke patients with aphasia. Clinical Rehabilitation, 29(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215514537656

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 6, 2014
Publication Date Jan 1, 2015
Deposit Date Apr 5, 2018
Publicly Available Date Apr 5, 2018
Journal Clinical Rehabilitation
Print ISSN 0269-2155
Electronic ISSN 1477-0873
Publisher SAGE Publications
Peer Reviewed Not Peer Reviewed
Volume 29
Issue 1
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215514537656
Keywords Aphasia, clinical evaluation, cognitive impairment, economic evaluation, health status
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/740200
Publisher URL http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0269215514537656

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations