Alessia Isopi email@example.com
Does consultation improve decision-making?
Isopi, Alessia; Nosenzo, Daniele; Starmer, Chris
Daniele Nosenzo firstname.lastname@example.org
CHRIS STARMER email@example.com
Professor of Experimental Economics
This paper reports an experiment designed to test whether prior consultation within a group affects subsequent individual decision-making in tasks where demonstrability of correct solutions is low. In our experiment, subjects considered two paintings created by two different artists and were asked to guess which artist made each painting. We observed answers given by individuals under two treatments: In one, subjects were allowed the opportunity to consult with other participants before making their private decisions; in the other, there was no such opportunity. Our primary findings are that subjects in the first treatment evaluate the opportunity to consult positively, but they perform significantly worse and earn significantly less.
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Publication Date||Jun 20, 2014|
|Journal||Theory and Decision|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|APA6 Citation||Isopi, A., Nosenzo, D., & Starmer, C. (2014). Does consultation improve decision-making?. Theory and Decision, 77(3), doi:10.1007/s11238-014-9449-9|
|Keywords||Consultation, decision making, group decisions, individual decisions|
|Copyright Statement||Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0|
Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
You might also like
Altruism, fast and slow? Evidence from a meta-analysis and a new experiment
Promoting voter registration: the effects of low-cost interventions on behaviour and norms
On the social inappropriateness of discrimination
Bonus versus penalty: how robust are the effects of contract framing?
The importance of peers for compliance with norms of fair sharing