Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Dubious by nature

Tallant, Jonathan

Dubious by nature Thumbnail


Authors



Abstract

There is a charge sometimes made in metaphysics that particular commitments are ‘hypothetical’, ‘dubious’ or ‘suspicious’. There have been two analyses given of what this consists in—due to Crisp (2007) and Cameron (2011). The aim of this paper is to reject both analyses and thereby show that there is no obvious way to press the objection against said commitments that they are ‘dubious’ and objectionable. Later in the paper I consider another account of what it might be to be ‘dubious’, and argue that this too fails. I use Bigelow's (1996) Lucretian properties as a vehicle for the discussions of dubiousness that follow. As a consequence, the paper ends up offering a partial defense of Lucretianism.

Citation

Tallant, J. (2013). Dubious by nature. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 43(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2013.812372

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Jul 16, 2013
Deposit Date Apr 17, 2014
Publicly Available Date Apr 17, 2014
Journal Canadian Journal of Philosophy
Print ISSN 0045-5091
Electronic ISSN 0045-5091
Publisher Routledge
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 43
Issue 1
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2013.812372
Keywords Presentism, Lucretianism, Hypothetical properties, Dubious properties, Suspicious properties, Point beyond
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/716536
Publisher URL http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00455091.2013.812372#.UyTYOFF_sb0

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations