Parallel distractor rejection as a binding mechanism in search
Dent, Kevin; Allen, Harriet A.; Braithwaite, Jason J.; Humphreys, Glyn W.
Harriet A. Allen mailto:H.A.Allen@nottingham.ac.uk
Jason J. Braithwaite
Glyn W. Humphreys email@example.com
The relatively common experimental visual search task of finding a red X amongst red O’s and green X’s (conjunction search) presents the visual system with a binding problem. Illusory conjunctions (ICs) of features across objects must be avoided and only features present in the same object bound together. Correct binding into unique objects by the visual system may be promoted, and ICs minimized, by inhibiting the locations of distractors possessing non-target features (e.g., Treisman and Sato, 1990). Such parallel rejection of interfering distractors leaves the target as the only item competing for selection; thus solving the binding problem. In the present article we explore the theoretical and empirical basis of this process of active distractor inhibition in search. Specific experiments that provide strong evidence for a process of active distractor inhibition in search are highlighted. In the final part of the article we consider how distractor inhibition, as defined here, may be realized at a neurophysiological level (Treisman and Sato, 1990).
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Publication Date||Aug 9, 2012|
|Journal||Frontiers in Psychology|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|APA6 Citation||Dent, K., Allen, H. A., Braithwaite, J. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2012). Parallel distractor rejection as a binding mechanism in search. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(278), doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00278|
|Copyright Statement||Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0|
Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
You might also like
Comparing drivers' visual attention at junctions in real and simulated environments
Does stereopsis account for the link between motor and social skills in adults?