Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

How do banking analysts behave around unanticipated news? Evidence from operational risk event announcements

Gya, Hurvashee; Barakat, Ahmed; Amess, Kevin; Chernobai, Anna

How do banking analysts behave around unanticipated news? Evidence from operational risk event announcements Thumbnail


Authors

Hurvashee Gya

AHMED BARAKAT Ahmed.Barakat@nottingham.ac.uk
Assistant Professor in Banking

KEVIN AMESS kevin.amess@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Managerial Economics

Anna Chernobai



Abstract

We study earnings per share (EPS) forecast revision and accuracy of banking analysts around operational risk event announcements in U.S. banks. We find that first announcements of operational risk events are more informative than their settlement announcements. Optimistic banking analysts revise their forecasts downward more aggressively around operational risk disclosures, thereby improving forecast accuracy. Career concerns of banking analysts cause an upward bias in forecast revision and deterioration in forecast accuracy only if the potential employer is a systemically important bank (SIB). We find consistent evidence linking competition among banking analysts with optimistic and inaccurate forecasts, which is consistent with analysts seeking to use inflated forecasts to curry favour and attract businesses to their brokerage house around the time of operational risk disclosures. Global settlement has no favourable impact on analyst forecast accuracy around operational risk event announcements. We find evidence supporting a materiality threshold of $10 million for the informativeness of operational risk event announcements in SIBs. Overall, our results shed light on optimism bias in banking analyst behaviour upon the arrival of unanticipated news.

Citation

Gya, H., Barakat, A., Amess, K., & Chernobai, A. (2021). How do banking analysts behave around unanticipated news? Evidence from operational risk event announcements. European Journal of Finance, 27(14), 1351-1391. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1870518

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Dec 21, 2020
Online Publication Date Feb 2, 2021
Publication Date 2021
Deposit Date Jan 5, 2021
Publicly Available Date Aug 3, 2022
Journal European Journal of Finance
Print ISSN 1351-847X
Electronic ISSN 1466-4364
Publisher Routledge
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 27
Issue 14
Pages 1351-1391
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1870518
Keywords Operational risk; unanticipated news; banking analyst; forecast revision and accuracy; career concerns; analyst competition; optimism bias
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/5201650
Publisher URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1870518
Additional Information This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Finance on 2 Feb 2021, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1870518

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations