Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Good for learning, bad for motivation? A meta-analysis on the effects of computer-supported collaboration scripts

Radkowitsch, Anika; Vogel, Freydis; Fischer, Frank

Good for learning, bad for motivation? A meta-analysis on the effects of computer-supported collaboration scripts Thumbnail


Authors

Anika Radkowitsch

Freydis Vogel

Frank Fischer



Abstract

Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning has been shown to greatly enhance learning, but is often criticized for hindering learners’ agency and thus undermining learners’ motivation. Beyond that, what makes some CSCL scripts particularly effective for learning is still a conundrum. This meta-analysis synthesizes the results of 53 primary studies that experimentally compared the effect of learning with a CSCL script to unguided collaborative learning on at least one of the variables motivation, domain learning, and collaboration skills. Overall, 5616 learners enrolled in K-12, higher education, or professional development participated in the included studies. The results of a random-effects meta-analysis show that learning with CSCL scripts leads to a non-significant positive effect on motivation (Hedges’ g = 0.13), a small positive effect (Hedges’ g = 0.24) on domain learning and a medium positive effect (Hedges’ g = 0.72) on collaboration skills. Additionally, the meta-analysis shows how scaffolding single particular collaborative activities and scaffolding a combination of collaborative activities affects the effectiveness of CSCL scripts and that synergistic or differentiated scaffolding is hard to achieve. This meta-analysis offers the first counterevidence against the widespread criticism that CSCL scripts have negative motivational effects. Furthermore, the findings can be taken as evidence for the robustness of the positive effects on domain learning and collaboration skills.

Citation

Radkowitsch, A., Vogel, F., & Fischer, F. (2020). Good for learning, bad for motivation? A meta-analysis on the effects of computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(1), 5–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09316-4

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 6, 2020
Online Publication Date Apr 16, 2020
Publication Date 2020-03
Deposit Date Apr 18, 2020
Publicly Available Date Apr 20, 2020
Journal International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
Print ISSN 1556-1607
Electronic ISSN 1556-1615
Publisher Springer Verlag
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 15
Issue 1
Pages 5–47
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09316-4
Keywords Human-Computer Interaction; Education
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/4309438
Publisher URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11412-020-09316-4
Additional Information Received: 8 September 2019; Accepted: 6 March 2020; First Online: 16 April 2020

Files




Downloadable Citations