Peer support for people with severe mental illness versus usual care in high-, middle- A nd low-income countries: Study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (UPSIDES-RCT)

Moran, Galia Sharon; Kalha, Jasmine; Mueller-Stierlin, Annabel; Kilian, Reinhold; Krumm, Silvia; Slade, Mike; Charles, Ashleigh; Mahlke, Candelaria; Nixdorf, Rebecca; Basangwa, David; Nakku, Juliet; Mpango, Richard; Ryan, Grace; Shamba, Donat; Ramesh, Mary; Ngakongwa, Fileuka; Grayzman, Alina; Pathare, Soumitra; Mayer, Benjamin; Puschner, Bernd

Abstract

© 2020 The Author(s). Background: Peer support is an established intervention involving a person recovering from mental illness supporting others with mental illness. Peer support is an under-used resource in global mental health. Building upon comprehensive formative research, this study will rigorously evaluate the impact of peer support at multiple levels, including service user outcomes (psychosocial and clinical), peer support worker outcomes (work role and empowerment), service outcomes (cost-effectiveness and return on investment), and implementation outcomes (adoption, sustainability and organisational change). Methods: UPSIDES-RCT is a pragmatic, parallel-group, multicentre, randomised controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of using peer support in developing empowering mental health services (UPSIDES) at four measurement points over 1 year (baseline, 4-, 8- A nd 12-month follow-up), with embedded process evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis. Research will take place in a range of high-, middle- A nd low-income countries (Germany, UK, Israel, India, Uganda and Tanzania). The primary outcome is social inclusion of service users with severe mental illness (N = 558; N = 93 per site) at 8-month follow-up, measured with the Social Inclusion Scale. Secondary outcomes include empowerment (using the Empowerment Scale), hope (using the HOPE scale), recovery (using Stages of Recovery) and health and social functioning (using the Health of the Nations Outcome Scales). Mixed-methods process evaluation will investigate mediators and moderators of effect and the implementation experiences of four UPSIDES stakeholder groups (service users, peer support workers, mental health workers and policy makers). A cost-effectiveness analysis examining cost-utility and health budget impact will estimate the value for money of UPSIDES peer support. Discussion: The UPSIDES-RCT will explore the essential components necessary to create a peer support model in mental health care, while providing the evidence required to sustain and eventually scale-up the intervention in different cultural, organisational and resource settings. By actively involving and empowering service users, UPSIDES will move mental health systems toward a recovery orientation, emphasising user-centredness, community participation and the realisation of mental health as a human right.

Citation

Moran, G. S., Kalha, J., Mueller-Stierlin, A., Kilian, R., Krumm, S., Slade, M., …Puschner, B. (2020). Peer support for people with severe mental illness versus usual care in high-, middle- A nd low-income countries: Study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (UPSIDES-RCT). Trials, 21(1), Article 371. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4177-7

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Feb 17, 2020
• Online Publication Date: May 1, 2020
• Publication Date: May 1, 2020
• Deposit Date: Feb 19, 2020
• Publicly Available Date: May 4, 2020
• Journal: Trials
• Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
• Publisher: Springer Verlag
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 21
• Issue: 1
• Article Number: 371
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4177-7
• Public URL: https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3992912
• Publisher URL: https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-020-4177-7