Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

NGO perspectives on the social and ethical dimensions of plant genome-editing

Helliwell, Richard; Hartley, Sarah; Pearce, Warren

Authors

Richard Helliwell

Sarah Hartley

Warren Pearce



Abstract

Plant genome editing has the potential to become another chapter in the intractable debate that has dogged agricultural biotechnology. In 2016, 107 Nobel Laureates accused Greenpeace of emotional and dogmatic campaigning against agricultural biotechnology and called for governments to defy such campaigning. The Laureates invoke the authority of science to argue that Greenpeace is putting lives at risk by opposing agricultural biotechnology and Golden Rice and is notable in framing Greenpeace as unethical and its views as marginal. This paper examines environmental, food and farming NGOs’ social and ethical concerns about genome editing, situating these concerns in comparison to alternative ethical assessments provided by the Nuffield Council on Bioethics, a key actor in this policy debate. In doing so, we show that participant NGOs and the Nuffield Council on Bioethics share considerable concerns about the social and ethical implications of genome editing. These concerns include choices over problem/solution framing and broader terminology, implications of regulatory and research choices on consumer choice and relations of power. However, GM-engaged NGOs and the Nuffield Council on Bioethics diverge on one important area: the NGOs seek to challenge the existing order and broaden the scope of debate to include deeply political questions regarding agricultural and technological choices. This distinction between the ethical positions means that NGOs provide valuable ethical insight and a useful lens to open up debate and discussion on the role of emerging technologies, such as genome editing, and the future of agriculture and food sovereignty.

Citation

Helliwell, R., Hartley, S., & Pearce, W. (2019). NGO perspectives on the social and ethical dimensions of plant genome-editing. Agriculture and Human Values, 36(4), 779–791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09956-9

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 11, 2019
Online Publication Date Jun 14, 2019
Publication Date Dec 1, 2019
Deposit Date Aug 6, 2019
Publicly Available Date Jun 15, 2020
Journal Agriculture and Human Values
Print ISSN 0889-048X
Electronic ISSN 1572-8366
Publisher Springer Verlag
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 36
Issue 4
Pages 779–791
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09956-9
Keywords Agricultural biotechnology, Plant genome editing, NGOs, Ethics, Nuffield council on bioethics
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2396945
Publisher URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10460-019-09956-9
Additional Information This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Agriculture and Human Values. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09956-9

Files




Downloadable Citations