DHURGSHARNA SHANMUGAVADIVEL Dhurgsharna.Shanmugavadivel@nottingham.ac.uk
Nihr Doctoral Research Fellow
Assessing and investigating children with suspected bone and abdominal tumours: an e-Delphi consensus process
Shanmugavadivel, Dhurgshaarna; Liu, Jo-Fen; Gamble, Ashley; Polanco, Angela; Vedhara, Kavita; Walker, David; Ojha, Shalini
Authors
JO-FEN LIU Jo-fen.Liu@nottingham.ac.uk
Research Assistant
Ashley Gamble
Angela Polanco
KAVITA VEDHARA kavita.vedhara@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor in Applied Psychology
David Walker
SHALINI OJHA Shalini.Ojha@nottingham.ac.uk
Clinical Associate Professor
Abstract
Background The incidence of childhood cancer has risen by 15% since the 1990s. Early diagnosis is key to optimising outcomes, however diagnostic delays are widely reported. Presenting symptoms are often non-specific causing a diagnostic dilemma for clinicians. This Delphi consensus process was conducted to develop a new clinical guideline for children and young people presenting with signs/symptoms suggestive of a bone or abdominal tumour. Methods Invitation emails were sent to primary and secondary healthcare professionals to join the Delphi panel. 65 statements were derived from evidence review by a multidisciplinary team. Participants were asked to rank their level of agreement with each statement on a 9-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree, 9=strongly agree), with responses ≥7 taken to indicate agreement. Statements not reaching consensus were rewritten and reissued in a subsequent round. Results All statements achieved consensus after two rounds. 96/133 (72%) participants responded to round 1 (R1) and 69/96 (72%) completed round 2 (R2). 62/65 (94%) statements achieved consensus in R1 with 29/65 (47%) gaining more than 90% consensus. Three statements did not reach consensus scoring between 61% and 69%. All reached numerical consensus at the end of R2. Strong consensus was reached on best practice of conducting the consultation, acknowledging parental instinct and obtaining telephone advice from a paediatrician to decide the timing and place of review, rather than adult cancer urgent referral pathways. Dissensus in statements was due to unachievable targets within primary care and valid concerns over a potential overinvestigation of abdominal pain.
Citation
Shanmugavadivel, D., Liu, J., Gamble, A., Polanco, A., Vedhara, K., Walker, D., & Ojha, S. (2023). Assessing and investigating children with suspected bone and abdominal tumours: an e-Delphi consensus process. BMJ Paediatrics Open, 7, Article e001771. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001771
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 3, 2023 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 3, 2023 |
Publication Date | Mar 3, 2023 |
Deposit Date | Mar 8, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 8, 2023 |
Journal | BMJ Paediatrics Open |
Electronic ISSN | 2399-9772 |
Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 7 |
Article Number | e001771 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001771 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/18230792 |
Publisher URL | https://bmjpaedsopen.bmj.com/content/7/1/e001771 |
Files
Assessing and investigating children with suspected bone and abdominal tumours: an e-Delphi consensus process
(5.6 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
NF1 optic pathway glioma. Analysing risk factors for visual outcome and indications to treat
(2020)
Journal Article