Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Planet Four: Craters—Optimizing task workflow to improve volunteer engagement and crater counting performance

Sprinks, J.; Houghton, R.; Bamford, S.; Morley, J. G.

Planet Four: Craters—Optimizing task workflow to improve volunteer engagement and crater counting performance Thumbnail


Authors

J. Sprinks

J. G. Morley



Abstract

Virtual citizen science platforms allow nonscientists to take part in scientific research across a range of disciplines, including planetary science. What is required of the volunteer can vary considerably in terms of task type, variety, judgment required, and autonomy—even when the overall goal is unchanged. Through analysis of our live Zooniverse Planet Four: Craters citizen science platform, the effects of task workflow design factors including volunteer autonomy, task variety, task type, and judgment required on volunteer engagement and crater marking performance were investigated. Website analytics showed volunteers using the Full interface (most autonomy and variety) were more likely to return to the platform, although the amount of time spent per visit was unaffected by the interface used. However, analysis of performance suggested that how this time was used did differ. The interface involving the least complex task resulted in the greatest amount of data and rate of collection, although this also coincided with a greater number of false positives when compared with the expert. Performance in terms of agreement, both between participants and with the expert judgment, was significantly improved when using the Stepped interface for crater position and the Ramped (Mark) when measuring diameter—interfaces that both directly measured the metric with a specific, delineated task. The implications for planetary scientists considering the citizen science route is that there is a balancing act to perform, weighing the importance of volunteer engagement with scientists' data needs and the resources that can be committed to data validation.

Citation

Sprinks, J., Houghton, R., Bamford, S., & Morley, J. G. (2019). Planet Four: Craters—Optimizing task workflow to improve volunteer engagement and crater counting performance. Meteoritics and Planetary Science, 54(6), 1325-1346. https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.13277

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 11, 2019
Online Publication Date Apr 7, 2019
Publication Date Jun 1, 2019
Deposit Date Apr 9, 2019
Publicly Available Date Apr 9, 2019
Journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science
Print ISSN 1086-9379
Electronic ISSN 1945-5100
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 54
Issue 6
Pages 1325-1346
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.13277
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1770972
Publisher URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/maps.13277

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations