Updated UK recommendations for HER2 assessment in breast cancer

Rakha, Emad A.; Pinder, Sarah E.; Bartlett, John M.S.; Ibrahim, Merdol; Starczynski, Jane; Carder, Pauline J.; Provenzano, Elena; Hanby, Andrew; Hales, Sally; Lee, Andrew H.S.; Ellis, Ian O.

Abstract

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression is present in approximately 15% of early invasive breast cancers, and is an important predictive and prognostic marker. The substantial benefits achieved with anti-HER2 targeted therapies in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer have emphasised the need for accurate assessment of HER2 status. Current data indicate that HER2 test accuracy improved following previous publication of guidelines and the implementation of an external quality assessment scheme with a decline in false-positive and false-negative rates. This paper provides an update of the guidelines for HER2 testing in the UK. The aim is to further improve the analytical validity and clinical utility of HER2 testing by providing guidelines of test performance parameters, and recommendations on the postanalytical interpretation of test results. HER2 status should be determined in all newly diagnosed and recurrent breast cancers. Testing involves immunohistochemistry with >10% complete strong membrane staining defining a positive status. In situ hybridisation, either fluorescent or bright field chromogenic, is used either upfront or in immunohistochemistry borderline cases to detect the presence of HER2 gene amplification. Situations where repeat HER2 testing is advised are outlined and the impact of genetic heterogeneity is discussed. Strict quality control and external quality assurance of validated assays are essential. Testing laboratories should perform ongoing competency assessment and proficiency tests and ensure the reliability and accuracy of the assay. Pathologists, oncologists and surgeons involved in test interpretation and clinical use should adhere to published guidelines and maintain accurate performance and consistent interpretation of test results.

Citation

Rakha, E. A., Pinder, S. E., Bartlett, J. M., Ibrahim, M., Starczynski, J., Carder, P. J., …Ellis, I. O. (2015). Updated UK recommendations for HER2 assessment in breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 68(2), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202571

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Sep 30, 2014
• Online Publication Date: Dec 8, 2014
• Publication Date: 2015-02
• Deposit Date: Nov 20, 2018
• Publicly Available Date: Feb 26, 2019
• Journal: Journal of Clinical Pathology
• Print ISSN: 0021-9746
• Electronic ISSN: 1472-4146
• Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 68
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 93-99
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202571
• Public URL: https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1288285
• Publisher URL: https://jcp.bmj.com/content/68/2/93