Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

From ideation to action: differentiating between those who think about suicide and those who attempt suicide in a national study of young adults

Wetherall, Karen; Cleare, Seonaid; Eschle, Sarah; Ferguson, Eamonn; O’Connor, Daryl B.; O’Carroll, Ronan E.; O’Connor, Rory C.

From ideation to action: differentiating between those who think about suicide and those who attempt suicide in a national study of young adults Thumbnail


Authors

Karen Wetherall

Seonaid Cleare

Sarah Eschle

EAMONN FERGUSON eamonn.ferguson@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Health Psychology

Daryl B. O’Connor

Ronan E. O’Carroll

Rory C. O’Connor



Abstract

Background: Although many suicide risk factors have been identified, there is still relatively little known about the factors that differentiate those who think about suicide from those who make a suicide attempt.
Aims: Using the integrated motivational-volitional model (IMV) of suicidal behaviour as a framework, this study hypothesised that i) motivational and volitional phase factors would differentiate non-suicidal controls from those who had a history of suicidal ideation or suicide attempts, and ii) within a multivariable model only volitional phase factors would differentiate between those who had a history of suicidal ideation and those who had attempted suicide.
Method: The Scottish Wellbeing Study (n=3508) is a nationally representative study of young people (18-34 years) recruited throughout Scotland. Using multinomial regression analysis, three groups (non-suicidal control (n=2534), lifetime suicide ideation (n=498) and lifetime suicide attempt (n=403) groups) were compared on motivational and volitional phase variables.
Results: Consistent with the IMV model, motivational and volitional phase variables differentiated the control group from both the ideation and attempt groups. Only volitional phase variables differentiated between the suicide attempt group and the suicidal ideation group in the multivariable model; with those reporting a suicide attempt being higher on acquired capability, mental imagery about death, impulsivity, and being more likely to know a friend who had made a suicide attempt. Having a family member or friend die by suicide or a family member attempt suicide did not differentiate between the groups.
Limitations: The findings were based on cross-sectional data derived from self-report measures.
Conclusions: These findings provide further support for the IMV model, and highlight potential targets for clinical intervention.

Citation

Wetherall, K., Cleare, S., Eschle, S., Ferguson, E., O’Connor, D. B., O’Carroll, R. E., & O’Connor, R. C. (2018). From ideation to action: differentiating between those who think about suicide and those who attempt suicide in a national study of young adults. Journal of Affective Disorders, 241, 475-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.07.074

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 23, 2018
Online Publication Date Jul 27, 2018
Publication Date Dec 1, 2018
Deposit Date Sep 17, 2018
Publicly Available Date Jul 28, 2019
Print ISSN 0165-0327
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 241
Pages 475-483
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.07.074
Keywords suicide, integrated motivational-volitional (IMV) model, ideation-to-action framework, theory
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1077179
Publisher URL https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0165032718312898?token=3756DDA1CFDADC48178C6C26CE14E2854490D7DA3B2189DA4AF710C13F4C244D0731096973B8C1B9D6839EF559E88E96

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations