Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Contradictory yet coherent?: inconsistency in performance feedback and R&D investment change

Lucas, Gerardus; Knoben, Joris; Meeus, Marius

Contradictory yet coherent?: inconsistency in performance feedback and R&D investment change Thumbnail


Authors

Joris Knoben

Marius Meeus



Abstract

In this paper, we study to what extent inconsistent feedback signals about performance affect firm adaptive behavior in terms of changes made to research-and-development (R&D) investments. We argue that inconsistency in performance feedback—based on discrepancies between two distinct performance signals—affects the degree to which such investments will be changed. Our aim is to show that accounting for inconsistent performance feedback is necessary as predictions for the direction of change in R&D investments based on the individual performance feedback signals are contradictory. Furthermore, we contribute by proposing a holistic consideration mechanism as an alternative to the selective attention mechanism previously applied to inconsistent performance feedback. Our findings show that the impact of inconsistency depends on the exact configuration of the underlying performance feedback signal discrepancies. While consistently negative performance feedback signals would amplify their impact in stimulating increased R&D investments, inconsistent performance feedback signals created more nuanced effects. Having lower performance compared to an industry-based peer group—despite doing well compared to the previous year—made firms decrease their R&D investments. For the opposite case of inconsistent performance feedback, we did not find an effect on change in R&D investments. These findings support to a degree our contention that explaining the effects of inconsistent performance feedback requires a holistic consideration theoretical mechanism instead of one involving selective attention. In sum, these findings suggest future research should take into account the differences between distinct instances of inconsistent performance feedback.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 3, 2015
Online Publication Date May 1, 2015
Publication Date Feb 1, 2018
Deposit Date Sep 12, 2018
Publicly Available Date Sep 13, 2018
Print ISSN 0149-2063
Publisher SAGE Publications
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 44
Issue 2
Pages 658-681
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315584821
Keywords performance feedback, inconsistency, behavioral theory of the firm, R&D
Publisher URL http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0149206315584821

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations