Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The environmental costs and benefits of high-yield farming

Balmford, Andrew; Amano, Tatsuya; Bartlett, Harriet; Chadwick, Dave; Collins, Adrian; Edwards, David; Field, Rob; Garnsworthy, Philip; Green, Rhys; Smith, Pete; Waters, Helen; Whitmore, Andrew; Broom, Donald M.; Chara, Julian; Finch, Tom; Garnett, Emma; Gathorne-Hardy, Alfred; Hernandez-Medrano, Juan; Herrero, Mario; Hua, Fangyuan; Latawiec, Agnieszka; Misselbrook, Tom; Phalan, Ben; Simmons, Benno; Takahashi, Taro; Vause, James; zu Ermgassen, Erasmus; Eisner, Rowan

Authors

Andrew Balmford

Tatsuya Amano

Harriet Bartlett

Dave Chadwick

Adrian Collins

David Edwards

Rob Field

Philip Garnsworthy

Rhys Green

Pete Smith

Helen Waters

Andrew Whitmore

Donald M. Broom

Julian Chara

Tom Finch

Emma Garnett

Alfred Gathorne-Hardy

Juan Hernandez-Medrano

Mario Herrero

Fangyuan Hua

Agnieszka Latawiec

Tom Misselbrook

Ben Phalan

Benno Simmons

Taro Takahashi

James Vause

Erasmus zu Ermgassen

Rowan Eisner



Abstract

How we manage farming and food systems to meet rising demand is pivotal to the future of biodiversity. Extensive field data suggest that impacts on wild populations would be greatly reduced through boosting yields on existing farmland so as to spare remaining natural habitats. High-yield farming raises other concerns because expressed per unit area it can generate high levels of externalities such as greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient losses. However, such metrics underestimate the overall impacts of lower-yield systems. Here we develop a framework that instead compares externality and land costs per unit production. We apply this framework to diverse data sets that describe the externalities of four major farm sectors and reveal that, rather than involving trade-offs, the externality and land costs of alternative production systems can covary positively: per unit production, land-efficient systems often produce lower externalities. For greenhouse gas emissions, these associations become more strongly positive once forgone sequestration is included. Our conclusions are limited: remarkably few studies report externalities alongside yields; many important externalities and farming systems are inadequately measured; and realizing the environmental benefits of high-yield systems typically requires additional measures to limit farmland expansion. Nevertheless, our results suggest that trade-offs among key cost metrics are not as ubiquitous as sometimes perceived.

Citation

Balmford, A., Amano, T., Bartlett, H., Chadwick, D., Collins, A., Edwards, D., …Eisner, R. (2018). The environmental costs and benefits of high-yield farming. Nature Sustainability, 1(9), 477-485. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0138-5

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 10, 2018
Online Publication Date Sep 14, 2018
Publication Date Sep 14, 2018
Deposit Date Aug 13, 2018
Publicly Available Date Mar 15, 2019
Journal Nature Sustainability
Electronic ISSN 2398-9629
Publisher Springer Nature
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 1
Issue 9
Pages 477-485
DOI https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0138-5
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1029195
Publisher URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-018-0138-5

Files





Related Outputs



Downloadable Citations