Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Danger theory: the link between AIS and IDS?

Aickelin, Uwe; Bentley, Peter; Cayzer, Steve; Kim, Jungwon; McLeod, Julie

Authors

Uwe Aickelin

Peter Bentley

Steve Cayzer

Jungwon Kim

Julie McLeod



Contributors

Jon Timmis
Editor

Peter Bentley
Editor

Emma Hart
Editor

Abstract

We present ideas about creating a next generation Intrusion Detection System (IDS) based on the latest immunological theories. The central challenge with computer security is determining the difference between normal and potentially
harmful activity. For half a century, developers have protected their systems by coding rules that identify and block specific events. However, the nature of current
and future threats in conjunction with ever larger IT systems urgently requires the development of automated and adaptive defensive tools. A promising solution is emerging in the form of Artificial Immune Systems (AIS): The Human Immune System (HIS) can detect and defend against harmful and previously unseen invaders, so can we not build a similar Intrusion Detection System (IDS) for our computers?
Presumably, those systems would then have the same beneficial properties as HIS like error tolerance, adaptation and self-monitoring. Current AIS have been successful on test systems, but the algorithms rely on self-nonself discrimination, as stipulated in classical immunology. However, immunologist are increasingly finding fault with traditional self-nonself thinking and a new ‘Danger Theory’ (DT) is emerging. This new theory suggests that the immune system reacts to threats based on the correlation of various (danger) signals and it provides a method of ‘grounding’ the immune response, i.e. linking it directly to the attacker. Little is currently understood of the precise nature and correlation of these signals and the theory is a topic of hot debate. It is the aim of this research to investigate this correlation and to translate the DT into the realms of computer security, thereby creating AIS that are no longer limited by self-nonself discrimination. It should be noted that we do not intend to defend this controversial theory per se, although as a deliverable this project will add to the body of knowledge in this area. Rather we are interested in its merits for scaling up AIS applications by overcoming self-nonself discrimination problems.

Citation

Aickelin, U., Bentley, P., Cayzer, S., Kim, J., & McLeod, J. (2003). Danger theory: the link between AIS and IDS?. In P. Bentley, J. Timmis, & E. Hart (Eds.), Artificial immune systems: second international conference, ICARIS 2003, Edinburgh, UK, September 1-3, 2003: proceedingsSpringer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-45192-1_15

Publication Date Jan 1, 2003
Deposit Date Feb 18, 2009
Publicly Available Date Feb 18, 2009
Journal Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Artificial Immune Systems (ICARIS2003), Edinburgh, UK
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Book Title Artificial immune systems: second international conference, ICARIS 2003, Edinburgh, UK, September 1-3, 2003: proceedings
ISBN 3540407669
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45192-1_15
Public URL http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/980
Publisher URL http://www.sigmod.org/dblp/db/conf/icaris/icaris2003.html
Additional Information The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations