@article { , title = {An evaluation of treatment integrity in a randomised controlled trial of memory rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis}, abstract = {Objective: To assess the treatment integrity of a memory rehabilitation programme for people with multiple sclerosis. SUBJECTS: Data were drawn from the intervention group of a randomised controlled trial of memory rehabilitation. This comprised 24 participants with multiple sclerosis. MEASURES: Four core session components were identified from the treatment manual: recap, activities, take-home activity and other. One video-recording of each of ten intervention sessions was transcribed and amount of time spent on components recorded. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between early and late stages of the programme in time spent on the core components (recap Z= -0.87, P=0.49; activities Z = -0.29, P=0.89; take-home activity Z = -0.59, P=0.69; other Z = -0.58, P=0.69). Thus, adherence to the manual was good with no evidence of programme drift. CONCLUSIONS: Good adherence indicates the intervention was delivered as described in the manual and strengthens confidence in the findings of the randomised controlled trial.}, doi = {10.1177/0269215514548733}, eissn = {1477-0873}, issn = {0269-2155}, issue = {5}, journal = {Clinical Rehabilitation}, note = {The authors no longer have the AAM}, publicationstatus = {Published}, publisher = {SAGE Publications}, url = {https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/748641}, volume = {29}, keyword = {Memory rehabilitation, multiple sclerosis, process evaluation, treatment integrity}, year = {2015}, author = {Smale, Kathryn J. and Carr, Sara E. and Schwartz, Annette F. and das Nair, Roshan and Lincoln, Nadina B.} }