@article { , title = {Red and processed meat consumption and purchasing behaviours and attitudes: impacts for human health, animal welfare and environmental sustainability}, abstract = {Objective: Higher intakes of red and processed meat are associated with poorer health outcomes and negative environmental impacts. Drawing upon a population survey the present paper investigates meat consumption behaviours, exploring perceived impacts for human health, animal welfare and the environment. Design: Structured self-completion postal survey relating to red and processed meat, capturing data on attitudes, sustainable meat purchasing behaviour, red and processed meat intake, plus sociodemographic characteristics of respondents. Setting: Urban and rural districts of Nottinghamshire, East Midlands, UK, drawn from the electoral register. Subjects: UK adults (n 842) aged 18–91 years, 497 females and 345 males, representing a 35·6 \% response rate from 2500 randomly selected residents. Results: Women were significantly more likely (P 60 years) were more likely to hold positive attitudes towards animal welfare (P}, doi = {10.1017/S1368980015000567}, eissn = {1475-2727}, issn = {1368-9800}, issue = {13}, journal = {Public Health Nutrition}, publicationstatus = {Published}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, url = {https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/747666}, volume = {19}, keyword = {meat, health, animal welfare, environment}, author = {Clonan, Angie and Wilson, Paul and Swift, Judy A. and Leibovici, Didier and Holdsworth, Michelle} }