@article { , title = {Chest Radiograph Scoring Alone or Combined with Other Risk Scores for Predicting Outcomes in COVID-19}, abstract = {Background Radiographic severity may help predict patient deterioration and outcomes from COVID-19 pneumonia. Purpose To assess the reliability and reproducibility of three chest radiograph reporting systems (radiographic assessment of lung edema [RALE], Brixia, and percentage opacification) in patients with proven SARS-CoV-2 infection and examine the ability of these scores to predict adverse outcomes both alone and in conjunction with two clinical scoring systems, National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) and International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium: Coronavirus Clinical Characterization Consortium (ISARIC-4C) mortality. Materials and Methods This retrospective cohort study used routinely collected clinical data of patients with polymerase chain reaction-positive SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to a single center from February 2020 through July 2020. Initial chest radiographs were scored for RALE, Brixia, and percentage opacification by one of three radiologists. Intra- and interreader agreement were assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients. The rate of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) or death up to 60 days after scored chest radiograph was estimated. NEWS2 and ISARIC-4C mortality at hospital admission were calculated. Daily risk for admission to ICU or death was modeled with Cox proportional hazards models that incorporated the chest radiograph scores adjusted for NEWS2 or ISARIC-4C mortality. Results Admission chest radiographs of 50 patients (mean age, 74 years ± 16 [standard deviation]; 28 men) were scored by all three radiologists, with good interreader reliability for all scores, as follows: intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.87 for RALE (95\% CI: 0.80, 0.92), 0.86 for Brixia (95\% CI: 0.76, 0.92), and 0.72 for percentage opacification (95\% CI: 0.48, 0.85). Of 751 patients with a chest radiograph, those with greater than 75\% opacification had a median time to ICU admission or death of just 1-2 days. Among 628 patients for whom data were available (median age, 76 years [interquartile range, 61-84 years]; 344 men), opacification of 51\%-75\% increased risk for ICU admission or death by twofold (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95\% CI: 1.6, 2.8), and opacification greater than 75\% increased ICU risk by fourfold (hazard ratio, 4.0; 95\% CI: 3.4, 4.7) compared with opacification of 0\%-25\%, when adjusted for NEWS2 score. Conclusion Brixia, radiographic assessment of lung edema, and percentage opacification scores all reliably helped predict adverse outcomes in SARS-CoV-2 infection. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Little in this issue.}, doi = {10.1148/radiol.2021210986}, eissn = {1527-1315}, issn = {0033-8419}, issue = {2}, journal = {Radiology}, note = {Need to add volume, issue, pagination. This journal does not permit the AAM to be deposited (see https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/14287) final version can be made open access after 6 month embargo. Replace proof with final published version when available.}, pages = {460-469}, publicationstatus = {Published}, publisher = {Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)}, url = {https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/6293734}, volume = {302}, keyword = {Radiology, chest radiograph scoring, risk scores, predicting outcomes, COVID-19}, year = {2022}, author = {Au-Yong, Iain and Higashi, Yutaro and Giannotti, Elisabetta and Fogarty, Andrew and Morling, Joanne R. and Grainge, Matthew and Race, Andrea and Juurlink, Irene and Simmonds, Mark and Briggs, Steve and Crooks, Colin J. and Cruikshank, Simon and Hammond-Pears, Susan and West, Joe and Card, Timothy} }