@techreport { , title = {Making science public: challenges and opportunities}, abstract = {This Programme investigated the relationship between science, politics and publics in the aftermath of an influential 2000 UK House of Lords Science and Society report. We conceptualised top-down initiatives promising greater transparency around the use of scientific evidence in policymaking and opportunities for public engagement around research and innovation agendas, as well as bottom-up instances of public mobilisation around science as an effort to make science public. In principle, such a movement seemed to speak directly to wider arguments for ‘opening up’ controversial domains of evidence and research to public scrutiny of framing, tacit assumptions, and alternative forms of expertise. Yet, these promises raised a number of dilemmas that we sought to examine in a range of cases.}, publicationstatus = {Published}, url = {https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2187813}, keyword = {science, politics, publics, public engagement, science advice, openness}, year = {2019}, author = {Raman, Sujatha and Nerlich, Brigitte and Cartelet, Clio and de Saille, Stevienna and Hadley Kershaw, Eleanor and Hartley, Sarah and Hobson-West, Pru and Holmwood, John and Lowndes, Vivien and Madziva, Roda and Martin, Paul and McLeod, Carmen and Millar, Kate and Mohr, Alison and Morris, Carol and Pearce, Warren and Seymour, Susanne and Smith, Alexander and Spencer, Adam and Tsouvalis, Judith} }